Where this offering fits
Wallarm API Security is an enquiry into the interfaces actually exposed and how they are used. Begin with application ownership, authentication and sensitive operations. The important distinction is between identifying an API, assessing its risk and authorising any protective action.
Architecture and rollout decisions
Confirm supported discovery or traffic integrations and approve the data-handling boundary. Compare the pilot’s inventory with known API specifications and deployed routes. Validate representative findings with developers and define retest. Keep obsolete, undocumented and inaccessible interfaces visible as separate states. Any enforcement change needs its own legitimate-traffic and recovery test.
An evaluation scenario for this offering
Select a known test API with an approved specification, a deployed route omitted from that specification and a retired route that should no longer be used. Compare the selected Wallarm integration’s view with engineering records and authorised traffic. Ask the owner to review the context of a representative finding, then correct the test issue and follow the agreed retest. Include an unobserved path so coverage limits remain explicit. Preserve API ownership, source evidence and remediation state. The objective is a verified interface-and-risk workflow, rather than assuming that a discovered route list is complete or automatically authorises enforcement.
Evidence to request for this scope
- Reconcile API discovery with engineering records.
- Validate authentication and exposure context.
- Assign remediation and retest responsibility.