Where this offering fits
Teramind DLP evaluation should focus on data-handling activities and the policy action needed for each. A legitimate bulk transfer and an unauthorised disclosure can look similar without business context. Define the sensitive information, affected endpoints and channels before enabling blocking or collecting detailed event evidence.
Architecture and rollout decisions
Select a small policy set and approved synthetic files for a monitor-first pilot. Review matches with data owners, checking both missed events and unnecessary alerts. Agree which actions can warn, block or simply report in the selected configuration. The support team needs a controlled exception route for legitimate work. Evidence visibility and retention should be approved separately from the decision to deploy an endpoint agent.
An evaluation scenario for this offering
Choose a synthetic document and exercise the same business task under permitted and prohibited conditions. Review the evidence available to the assigned data reviewer and the user’s route to request an exception. Include an application that handles similar but non-sensitive content. The evaluation should establish a policy that is understandable and supportable, rather than count every event as a successful detection or assume that blocking more activity always produces a better outcome.
Evidence to request for this scope
- Confirm operating-system and application support for the required data-use controls.
- Demonstrate a permitted workflow, a prohibited transfer and an approved exception.
- Verify the minimum evidence needed for incident review and the roles allowed to inspect it.